According to Time, Mark Zuckerberg is the Person of the Year. Why not? Facebook looks like it going to take over the earth. The guy’s not even out of his twenties and there has been a Golden Globe nominated major motion picture made about him. It seems like everything Facebook touches right now succeeds.
But I think that Time missed the boat, because I don’t think that this should be the Year of the Zuck, but because I think this should be the Year of the Suck. As in Executives that are clearly making bad choices that are costing employees their jobs and still raking in the cash like it’s 1999.
And we have a nice group of them, starting off with the former head of HP, Mark Hurd, who made HP employees pine for the halcyon days of Carly Fiorina. That takes talent. Firing him over fudging his expense reports in connection with some shady hanky-panky with a former marketing contractor seemed cheap in some respects, but don’t cry for Marky Mark. After all, HP’s board then gave him a severance package of forty to fifty million to make sure he wouldn’t sue them. Then he turned around and was hired by Larry Ellison. A classic example of failing upward.
Next on the list is Steve Ballmer. Starts off the year touting tablets at CES. What’s he doing this upcoming January? Touting tablets at CES. How many tablets have been released running Windows this past year? Right. It brings to mind the line about how insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome. While Apple has taken the money and run, Steve cancelled development on Courier, the one tablet concept that was different enough to have taken on the other Steve’s iPad and won. In the mean time, Microsoft released the Kin, a “smartphone” that was neither all that smart nor much of a phone. Someone had the good sense to kill it about a month later. Windows Phone 7 was then released, to a great yawning of the general public. Not because it wasn’t good – it really is. The fact is that somewhere along the line, Ballmer and company decided that bold was something that someone else did. Which is one probable reason why Ray Ozzie finally said “forget this” and left. Right now Microsoft needs boldness. But instead, Baldo gives it safe bureaucracy. But hey, why should he care? He’s getting paid a king’s ransom.
And where would the year be without Carol Bartz? Laying off five percent of your staff a week before Christmas only epitomizes the tin ear that she has brought to Yahoo. This only drives home the question “Why did Microsoft think it was a good deal to buy Yahoo in the first place?” I mean, Jerry Yang was pretty bad, but Carol “the Swear Engine” Bartz seems to be bound and determined to make sure the next group that wants to lay down some coin for Yahoo will be getting it at fire sale prices. As has been pointed out, Yahoo is sitting on what could easily be their salvation – Flickr – and yet Yahoo is acting as if it is a red headed step-child. All this, and she’s getting paid 47.2 million this year. Nice work, if you can get it.
And that’s only three. When you throw in bank CEO’s that drove the world economy into a ditch, yet still feel they are deserving of muti-million dollar bonuses, “just because”, you really start to wonder. Kudos to Mark and all the other corporate leaders that are successful in these times; it takes a lot. But given these times, the spotlight should really have fallen on those who have made it that much worse. And when I say “Having the spotlight fall on them”, I mean that. Literally.



